Bulletin "Veterinary biotechnology"

Cite: Bezymennyi M., & Tarasov O. (2024). Prostorovyi rozpodil ta aktyvnist statsionarno neblahopoluchnykh za sybirkoiu punktiv v Ukraini [Spatial distribution and activity of anthrax reported localities in Ukraine]. Veterynarna biotekhnolohiia – Veterinary biotechnology, 44, 9-28. https://doi.org/10.31073/vet_biotech44-01 [in Ukrainian]. 

 

BEZYMENNYI M., e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.TARASOV O., e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Institute of Veterinary Medicine of the NAAS

 

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND ACTIVITY OF ANTHRAX REPORTED LOCALITIES IN UKRAINE

   Introduction. In recent two decades, there have been sporadic cases of anthrax in Ukraine, but more than 10000 anthrax reported localities registered in the past continue to pose a constant risk of new outbreaks. Identifying patterns in the spatial distribution and activity of anthrax reported localities can enhance our understanding of the pathogen’s ecology and improve preventive measures.

   The goal of the work. To describe the spatial distribution and activity of anthrax reported localities in Ukraine from 1920 to 2023.

   Materials and methods. In this article, we mapped and analyzed the spatial distribution of 8928 anthrax reported localities between 1920 and 2023. Spatial analysis and mapping were performed in ESRI ArcGIS 10.4 and QGIS 3.34.

   We used Average Nearest Neighbor Index to identify spatial pattern of anthrax reported localities and to compare it with the pattern of all populated locations in Ukraine.

   We used choropleth maps with a Jenks classification scheme to display both the absolute number of anthrax reported localities at the regional level and the percentage of anthrax-affected localities relative to the total number of populated locations in each region.

   Both Unweighted Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) and KDE weighted by the total number of outbreaks per site were utilized to identify anthrax hotspots.

   We calculated descriptive statistics on the number of outbreaks, activity intervals, and periods between recurring outbreaks in anthrax reported localities.

   The Gi* statistic was used to identify clusters of anthrax-affected localities with the highest number of outbreaks and longest activity intervals.

   Results of research and discussion. The ANNI method has determined that anthrax reported localities are statistically significantly dispersed across the territory of Ukraine, which somewhat mirrors the distribution of all settlements in the country.

   At the regional level, the minimum number of anthrax reported localities is 117, found in Volyn region; the maximum is 763, found in Vinnytsia region; and the average for all regions is 357. The minimum percentage of anthrax reported localities relative to the total number of populated locations is 10.6%, found in Volyn region; the maximum is 49.8%, found in Vinnytsia region; and the average is 29.3%.

   The KDE method has identified areas with the highest density of anthrax reported localities in Ukraine. These areas mostly stretched across the country from Lviv region in the west to Sumy region in the east, covering most of the broadleaf forest and forest-steppe zones. The lowest density of anthrax reported localities is observed in the northern parts of Volyn, Rivne, Zhytomyr, and Kyiv regions.

   The median activity interval is 2 years, with the maximum reaching 81 years.There are 422 anthrax reported localities with the activity interval of 35 years or more. These localities are present in all regions of Ukraine.

   The interval between repeated outbreaks in the same location can extend up to 65 years.Outbreaks in the last decade occurred in anthrax reported localities with intervals ranging from 25 to 65 years from the previous ones, averaging 53 years.

   The median number of outbreaks in anthrax reported localities is 2, with a minimum of 1 outbreak and a maximum of 72.

   Gi* statistics identified hot clusters of anthrax reported localities based on the number of outbreaks in 17 regions and on activity intervals in 18 out of 25 regions of Ukraine. In general, clusters identified by both parameters are located in the same places.

   Conclusions and prospects for further research. Approximately one-third of populated localities in Ukraine have reported anthrax cases previously. They are statistically dispersed throughout Ukraine, mirroring the spatial distribution of all populated localities in the country. However, there is local variation not only in their distribution but also in the number of outbreaks and activity intervals. Certain regions exhibit clusters of anthrax reported localities with high numbers of outbreaks and long activity intervals. Further research is needed to understand the reasons for such clustering and the conditions favoring long-term activity.

   The presence of numerous anthrax reported localities in all regions of Ukraine, with activity interval of 35 years or more, suggests that favorable conditions for anthrax persistence may exist almost everywhere in Ukraine.

   The long intervals between outbreaks, which can reach 65 years, highlight the persistent threat of anthrax.

   The long intervals between recurrent outbreaks, which can be 65 years, emphasize the importance of ongoing preventive measures.

   The detection of new anthrax reported localities in recent years may indicate data deficiencies and the possible presence of unknown soil anthrax foci.

Keywords: anthrax, spatial analysis, mapping, anthrax-affected localities.

REFERENCES

  1. Carlson, C.J., Getz, W.M., Kausrud, K.L., Cizauskas, C.A., Blackburn, J.K., Bustos Carrillo, F.A., Colwell, R., Easterday, W.R., Ganz, H.H., Kamath, P.L., Økstad, O.A., Turner, W.C., Kolstø, A.-B., & Stenseth, N.C. (2018). Spores and soil from six sides: interdisciplinarity and the environmental biology of anthrax (Bacillus anthracis). Biological Reviews, 93(4), 1813-1831. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12420.
  2. Dragon, D.C., & Rennie, R.P. (1995). The ecology of anthrax spores: tough but not invincible. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 36(5), 295-301.
  3. Elvander, M., Persson, B., & Sternberg Lewerin, S. (2017). Historical cases of anthrax in Sweden 1916–1961. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 64(3), 892-898. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12456.
  4. Finke, E.-J., Beyer, W., Loderstädt, U., & Frickmann, H. (2020). Review: The risk of contracting anthrax from spore-contaminated soil – A military medical perspective. European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology, 10. https://doi.org/10.1556/1886.2020.00008.
  5. Hsieh, H.-Y., & Stewart, G. C. (2023). Does environmental replication contribute to Bacillus anthracis spore persistence and infectivity in soil? Research in Microbiology, 174(5), 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2023.104052.
  6. Dey, R., Hoffman, P. S., & Glomski, I. J. (2012). Germination and amplification of anthrax spores by soil-dwelling amoebas. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78(22), 8075-8081. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02034-12.
  7. Ganz, H.H., Turner, W.C., Brodie, E.L., Kusters, M., Shi, Y., Sibanda, H., Torok, T., & Getz, W.M. (2014). Interactions between Bacillus anthracis and Plants May Promote Anthrax Transmission. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 8(6), e2903. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002903.
  8. Saile, E., & Koehler, T.M. (2006). Bacillus anthracis multiplication, persistence, and genetic exchange in the rhizosphere of grass plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(5), 3168-3174. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.5.3168-3174.2006.
  9. Schuch, R., & Fischetti, V.A. (2009). The Secret Life of the Anthrax Agent Bacillus anthracis: Bacteriophage-Mediated Ecological Adaptations. PLOS ONE, 4(8), e6532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006532.
  10. Hugh-Jones, M., & Blackburn, J. (2009). The ecology of Bacillus anthracis. Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 30(6), 356.
  11. Gainer, R. (2016). Yamal and anthrax. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 57(9), 985-987.
  12. Žmak, L., Bošnjak, S., Pem Novosel, I., Juzbašić, T., Vilibić-Čavlek, T., Tabain, I., Miškić, T., Lohman Janković, I., Brkić, I., & Gverić Grginić, A. (2024). Large Anthrax Outbreak in a New Locality in Croatia, 2022. Life, 14(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14030349.
  13. Kozytska, T., Bassiouny, M., Chechet, O., Ordynska, D., Galante, D., Neubauer, H., & Wareth, G. (2023). Retrospective Analysis of Official Data on Anthrax in Europe with a Special Reference to Ukraine. Microorganisms, 11(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051294.
  14. Korniienko, L.Y., Ukhovskyi, V.V., Moroz, O.A., Chechet, O.M., Haidei, O.S., Tsarenko, T.M., Bondarenko, T.M., Karpulenko, M.S., & Nenych, N.P. (2022). Epizootological and epidemiological situation of anthrax in Ukraine in the context of mandatory specific prevention in susceptible animals. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 13(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.15421/022245.
  15. Bondarenko, G.F., Pogrebnyak, L.I., Dubrovin, E.I., Kharchuk, A.N., & Shepchenko, V.U. (1973). Nekotorye voprosy ehpizootologii sibirskoj yazvy [Some issues of anthrax epizootology]. Veterinariya – Veterinary medicine, 6, 48-50 [in Russian].
  16. Biloivan, O., Stegniy, B., Gerilovych, A., Arefiev, V., Wölfel, R., Schwarz, J., Popp, C., & Grass, G. (2020). Screening of possibly anthrax-contaminated burial sites in eastern and southern Ukraine. Agricultural Science and Practice, 7, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.15407/agrisp7.03.003.
  17. Bezymennyi, M., Bagamian, K.H., Barro, A., Skrypnyk, A., Skrypnyk, V., & Blackburn, J.K. (2014). Spatio-temporal patterns of livestock anthrax in Ukraine during the past century (1913–2012). Applied Geography, 54, 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.07.016.
  18. Korotich, A.S., & Pogrebnyak, L.I. (1976). Sibirskaya yazva [Anthrax]. Urozhai [in Russian].
  19. Sinitsyn, V.A., Yanenko, U.M., Zaviryukha, G.A., Vasileva, T.B., Tarasov, O.A., Kosyanchuk, N.I., & Mizukina, L.M. (2019). The situation of anthrax which is on the territory of Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 9(3), 112-116. https://doi.org/10.15421/2019_717.
  20. Vydayko, N., & Novohatniy, Y. (2017). Current assessment of risks of anthrax outbreaks in Ukraine. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 9(1), e151.
  21. Derzhavnyy Departament Veterynarnoyi Medytsyny Minahropromu Ukrayiny [State Department of Veterinary Medicine of the Ministry of Agriculture of Ukraine]. Instruktsiia pro zakhody z profilaktyky ta borotby z sybirkoiu tvaryn» – Regulations on Measures for the Prevention and Control of Anthrax in Animals, No. 4 from 25.01.2000 [in Ukrainian]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/z0136-00.
  22. Bobylova, O.O., Mukharska, L.M., Nekrasova, L.S., & Nesterenko, L.P. (2001). Sybirka v Ukraini. Epidemiolohichnyi analiz za 55 rokiv (1946-2001) [Anthrax in Ukraine. Epidemiological analysis for 55 years (1946-2001)]. Suchasni infektsii – Current infections, 3, 5-9 [in Ukrainian].
  23. Tovstyha, V. (2012). Pro nebezpeku sybirky ta prychyny yii vynyknennia [About the danger of anthrax and its causes]. Veterynarna medytsyna Ukrainy – Veterinary medicine of Ukraine, 12(202), 40-41 [in Ukrainian].
  24. Kas’yanenko, A.M., Verner, O.M., Zaviryukha, A.I., & Sinyak, K.M. (1984). Harakteristika pochv v stacionarno neblagopoluchnykh po sibirskoj yazve punktakh [Soil characterization in stationary anthrax-affected sites]. Zhurn. mikrobiol. J of Microbiology, 1, 90-95 [in Russian].
  25. Zaviryukha, A.I., Kharchuk, O.M., & Trotsenko, B.L. (1979). Kataloh statsionarno neblahopoluchnykh po sybirtsi punktiv 1920-1978 rr. [Catalog of stationary anthrax reported sites 1920-1978.] [dataset] [in Ukrainian].
  26. WAHIS: World Animal Health Information System. (2024). WOAH – World Organization for Animal Health. https://wahis.woah.org/#/home.
  27. Runfola, D., Anderson, A., Baier, H., Crittenden, M., Dowker, E., Fuhrig, S., Goodman, S., Grimsley, G., Layko, R., Melville, G., Mulder, M., Oberman, R., Panganiban, J., Peck, A., Seitz, L., Shea, S., Slevin, H., Youngerman, R., & Hobbs, L. (2020). geoBoundaries: A global database of political administrative boundaries. PLOS ONE, 15(4), e0231866. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231866.
  28. QGIS Development Team. (2024). QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS Association. https://www.qgis.org.
  29. R Core Team. (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
  30. Clark, P.J., & Evans, F.C. (1954). Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations. Ecology, 35(4), 445-453. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931034.
  31. Fotheringham, A.S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2000). Quantitative geography: perspectives on spatial data analysis. Sage.
  32. Herrera, G. (2018). Standard Distance plugin for QGIS 3 (1.0.1) [Computer software]. https://github.com/GuillemHerrera/StandardDistance.
  33. Nelson, T., & Boots, B. (2008). Detecting spatial hot spots in landscape ecology. Ecography, 31, 556-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.05548.x.
  34. Ord, J.K., & Getis, A. (1995). Local Spatial Autocorrelation Statistics: Distributional Issues and an Application. Geographical Analysis, 27(4), 286-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x.
  35. Mitchell, A. (2005). The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis: Spatial measurements & statistics. ESRI. https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=sdSTlwEACAAJ.

 Download full text in PDF